Free thinker

 Islam is more than a religion and was conceived primarily as a political movement. It was the political and military aspects of Islam that spearheaded the success of military conquest throughout the Middle East and North Africa. The Quran even goes so far as to prohibit Muslims from co-existing with the Infidel, unless, of course, they have completed the conquest of that Infidel nation. Islam, by definition, is at war with every infidel nation. Peaceful co-existence is only allowed as a temporary means of lulling the enemy. The ‘religion of peace’ nonsense preached by left-wing liberals, not the Muslims themselves, is only true once the conquest of the entire planet has been completed and all living in one big Caliphate, under Sharia Law. After WWII people wondered how Hitler achieved so many of his aims when he had published it all in a book, Mein Kampf, well in advance. Quran is similar, which tells us very specifically what their intentions are with regard to the conquest of Eu...

 There have been many people on social media trying to intimidate and silence me. They usually belong to two camps: either they are Muslim or "progressive." In Europe, according to certain “progressives”, everything falls under freedom of speech... except what I share based on knowledge and experience I gained while living under the yoke of Islam. I never imagined that I could ever experience so much hate in the West because of the same criticism. It’s a capital mistake that in the name of a principle like religious freedom, we applaud certain inhuman practices happening from a religion like Islam that took shape 1400 years ago. This religion also contains hateful misogynistic and totalitarian ideologies that may rightly be criticized in order not to lose the freedom that people have fought for in the West. Tolerance towards intolerants can destroy an entire civilisation.  If you have to condone everything that can be seen as freedom of religion because it is a religious ritu...

 Islam has an underlying pattern of hate, deceit, anger, sexual misconduct, lies, the need to control others through subtle and not-so-subtle ways, terror inflicted on others, etc.  Islam and its teaching are not good psychologically for human beings, it prevents genuine connections to others. It imposes views on others and is a controlling way of life, that destroys the human experiences of life. There is no freedom of thought. It's based on a fear model at its heart and satisfies the carnal instinct of men. Eating, drinking, mating, sleeping, and defending, are basic survival instincts. There are no higher philosophical aspects in the teachings of Islam.  Mohammad's life just revolves around his addictions to sex and violence. It's not about who Allah is or not but if we step back we can see a very dysfunctional people. There is no love present in Islam. It's very controlling in all aspects of life and destructive to the human spirit.

"Most people don't remain faithful to the religion in which they were born into. Some convert to another religion that seems more logical and comfortable for them. Others take a step further and declare that they become atheists and completely rejected religion, but this decision is costly to them, turns their lives upside down, and risks losing their lives due to death threats. So atheism is the same thing as a scientific attitude towards existence. That the decision to withdraw from all the gods that man has invented over time, should be obvious to all, in this context, the number of people seeking protection and asylum in Europe is increasing. Indeed, globalization with social media showing different life forms and interactions between people distinct from that known. But are European countries adapted to this? Apparently not. There are no guidelines or information on the situation of these asylum seekers, according to international human rights and minority hum...

Eight years after it launched the Arab spring, Tunisia’s case in the minds of most Westerners broadly, is portrayed as a model of a successful democratic transition, ensuring guaranteeing freedom, free opinion and rights for all citizens of different affiliations. But Tunisia remains - by contrast above. However- The reality ,is dawning upon all. On Sunday, 13 October, Tunisians has voted for a new president, Kais Saïed, who was elected with a landslide majority of 72.5% of the vote, at the expense of his rival nabil karoui, who is accused of tax fraud, money laundering and ties to terrorist organizations; although Kais Saïed has no party, an ambiguous political program, and little faith in the country’s political system. Throughout his campaign, he has been outspoken on the Palestine issue, where Mr Saïed has made solidarity with Palestine a key theme. In the run up for the elections, during a presidential debate live on TV, when asked about his position on normalizing rela...

Eight years after it launched the arab spring, Tunisia is still—by contrast. Tunisia’s case in the minds of most Westerners broadly, is portrayed as the cradle of democracy the freedoms, guaranteeing free opinion and rights for all citizens of different affiliations, but I believe that this portrayal is exaggerated and contrary to what is happening inside the country. A citizen who is deeply rooted in the fundamentalism that has prevailed over the past fourteen centuries has seen that the simplest rights and freedoms in his life can’t be reached because of the brutality of the intellectual repression that is imposed on him. After the revolution and the constitutional amendment, Tunisia has moved forward toward modernity for external cosmetic purposes, then return to internal purposes in order to maintain positions. The 2014 constitution begins with the name of God and ends with “God is the guarantor of success.” It represents an expression of “commitment to the teachings of ...

Anyone says hijab is not forced or to be specific, it’s not a law for women to wear hijab answer me this: if a woman complained in a lawsuit her family are forcing her to wear hijab in Muslims society what would happen? If young girls are being indoctrinated from a young age into believing that burqa is essential for their modesty, then it doesn't matter if it’s forced or not. It’s an inherently misogynistic practice that should not be accepted, let alone glorified as many shamelessly do. People always says that if you wear modest clothing, hijab or even better, niqab - you'd be safe from rape, or harassment. Have you asked women who wears them and get harassed? Do you block that information out? Do you still blame them for being harassed? If the men, or society can't respect women, see them as equal, worthy of respect, and what not.. You dehumanize them, belittle them, objectify them, hypersexualize them - regardless what they wear, they'll still be harassed , ...